Historic Verdict
The Pakistan Army has confirmed that its former intelligence chief, Lieutenant General (retd) Faiz Hameed, has been sentenced to fourteen years of rigorous imprisonment. The punishment was handed down after a Field General Court Martial that began in August 2024 and continued for fifteen months, concluding on December 11, 2025. This marks a historic moment, as it is the first time in Pakistan’s history that a former ISI chief has been convicted through a military court process.
Charges and Conviction
According to the Inter‑Services Public Relations (ISPR), the retired general faced four charges. These included involvement in political activities, violation of the Official Secrets Act in ways harmful to state interests, misuse of authority and government resources, and causing wrongful loss to citizens. After lengthy proceedings, the court found him guilty on all counts and announced the sentence.
Legal Process
ISPR emphasized that the trial was conducted under the Pakistan Army Act and followed all legal requirements. The statement noted that Faiz Hameed was allowed to appoint a defence team of his choice and was given all rights afforded under military law. Importantly, he retains the right to appeal the verdict before the relevant forum.
Political and Legal Reactions
The announcement has triggered strong reactions. Information Minister Attaullah Tarar welcomed the decision, saying it was based on evidence and showed accountability for crossing “red lines.” Faiz Hameed’s legal team, however, has not yet issued a response. Analysts believe the case will spark debate about the role of retired military officers in politics and accountability mechanisms within the armed forces.
Background: Top City Case
The proceedings are linked to the Top City housing society case, which reached the Supreme Court in 2023. Petitioner Muiz Ahmed Khan accused Faiz Hameed and associates of misuse of authority, raids on property, and coercion involving valuables and cash. The Supreme Court directed the Defence Ministry and Army to investigate, leading to the formation of a committee in April 2024.
Legal Framework
Military legal experts explained that normally a retired officer cannot be court‑martialed after six months. However, exceptions exist under Sections 31 and 40 of the Army Act. Section 31 covers incitement to rebellion, while Section 40 deals with corruption and fraud. These provisions allow proceedings against retired officers if such allegations are proven, even years after retirement.
Wider Implications
The case has raised questions about military accountability and the scope of the Army Act. Observers suggest the verdict could set a precedent for holding retired senior officers answerable for misconduct, even after leaving service. It also highlights the growing demand for transparency in cases involving powerful figures, reinforcing the principle that no one is above the law.